In 2021 legÂislaÂtive sesÂsions there have been 425 bills proÂposed in forty-nine states designed to, in some meaÂsure, supÂpress votÂing. To be fair, in some of these states new laws were also enactÂed that allowed some expanÂsion of votÂing rights, such as restorÂing such rights to conÂvictÂed perÂsons and requirÂing more accesÂsiÂbilÂiÂty to impaired voters.
In Kentucky, a good many of the expandÂed votÂing accomÂmoÂdaÂtions that were put in place for the 2020 genÂerÂal elecÂtion due to the COVID panÂdemÂic were allowed to remain for future elecÂtions — due in large part to the coöperÂaÂtive efforts of the Republican Secretary of State Adams and Democratic Governor Beshear. And folÂlowÂing that elecÂtion, sevÂerÂal thouÂsand votÂers’ names were purged from the votÂing lists, mostÂly due to death.
It’s posÂsiÂble that a great many peoÂple had thought that the Jim Crow laws were a thing of the past. But it would appear that they are being reinÂvigÂoÂratÂed in varÂiÂous forms and under difÂferÂent names, most often in the guise of votÂer secuÂriÂty, citÂing unproven and disÂputÂed examÂples of votÂer fraud although virÂtuÂalÂly every study of the 2020 elecÂtions showed that they were the most secure in hisÂtoÂry and with absoluteÂly insignifÂiÂcant fraud.
Jim Crow laws began showÂing up in state and local jurisÂdicÂtions shortÂly after the conÂcluÂsion of the Civil War and conÂtinÂued with added veheÂmence until 1964, when President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. Even then, it was anothÂer four years before added proÂviÂsions secured genÂerÂal civÂil libÂerÂties for all Americans.
The Voting Rights Act became law in 1965 but it was set to expire in ten years and reauÂthoÂrized in 1975.
It seemed that the Act was being conÂtinÂuÂalÂly re-authoÂrized as it was in 1992 for fifÂteen years and again in 2006 for 25 years — which begs the quesÂtion of why this should be necÂesÂsary. Why not just pass the law and make it perÂmaÂnent until and unless it is – or porÂtions of it – are deterÂmined to be unconstitutional?
In 2019, a biparÂtiÂsan bill (sponÂsored by one Democrat and one Republican) was introÂduced to update the Voting Rights Act to apply specifÂiÂcalÂly to thirÂteen states which had a hisÂtoÂry of votÂer supÂpresÂsion. On December 6, 2019, the House of Representatives votÂed 228–187 in favor of the bill with only one Republican votÂing in favor. President Trump threatÂened to veto the bill if it was approved by the Senate.
Two acts are curÂrentÂly before Congress to improve votÂer access: the Freedom to Vote Act in the Senate and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which has passed the House and would comÂpleÂment the Senate act. And expanÂsion and conÂsolÂiÂdaÂtion of votÂing rights are being held up in the Senate largeÂly because of esoÂteric rules that preÂvent a simÂple majorÂiÂty of that body to pass legislation.
Now the counÂtry is underÂgoÂing masÂsive redisÂtrictÂing based on the 2020 cenÂsus, and this proÂvides anothÂer opporÂtuÂniÂty for the unscrupuÂlous to manipÂuÂlate the way in which elecÂtions are carÂried out. One has only to look at the present Kentucky legÂislaÂtive disÂtricts to underÂstand that gerÂryÂmanÂderÂing is alive and well and will most likeÂly show up again when the new map is drawn.
It is long past time in this counÂtry for Congress to pass true biparÂtiÂsan laws which stipÂuÂlate some simÂple and inviÂoÂlable rules govÂernÂing all elecÂtions, rules which canÂnot be abroÂgatÂed by the machiÂnaÂtions of local and state offiÂcials for politÂiÂcal reaÂsons. There is no reaÂson why rules canÂnot be estabÂlished that will apply equalÂly and imparÂtialÂly across the counÂtry, whether it be in New York or Alabama or Arizona — rules that will guarÂanÂtee that every qualÂiÂfied citÂiÂzen over the age of eighÂteen has reaÂsonÂable, effiÂcient access to the votÂing booth.

