Erikson’s stages of the soul

|

Estimated time to read:

2–3 minutes

Maybe some of you have heard of Erik Erikson. He was a devel­op­men­tal psy­chol­o­gist who devel­oped a way to explain human devel­op­ment across the lifes­pan. I am not an expert on human devel­op­ment or Erikson, but to my under­stand­ing, his idea goes some­thing like this. 

Each per­son must pass through a series of stages as they devel­op into an adult and beyond. Failure to resolve a stage impairs a per­son­’s abil­i­ty to move on to the next stage. The stages are focused on the con­cepts of trust, auton­o­my, ini­tia­tive, indus­try, iden­ti­ty, inti­ma­cy, gen­er­a­tiv­i­ty, and integrity. 

According to Erikson, if a per­son nev­er devel­ops trust in infan­cy, they may nev­er reach full adult­hood. They may always be held back by that lack of trust and nev­er become a per­son of auton­o­my and ini­tia­tive. If a teenager/young adult doesn’t devel­op a sense of iden­ti­ty, they are for­ev­er hin­dered by it and strug­gle to move on and form inti­mate rela­tion­ships as an adult. If a per­son nev­er learns to work for the greater good (gen­er­a­tiv­i­ty), they might not devel­op the integri­ty need­ed to accept old age and death. 

I have no clue if Erikson was right, but some of what he says makes sense. When we encounter an adult who lacks trust, ini­tia­tive, or auton­o­my, we tend to accuse that per­son of being “child­ish.” When we inter­act with chil­dren who have well-formed iden­ti­ties and well-estab­lished rela­tion­ships with oth­ers, we call them “mature.”

We all see exam­ples of old­er adults who face their own mor­tal­i­ty with integri­ty and accep­tance, and those who rebel like unruly teenagers at the harsh­ness of aging. And some of us have had the unfor­tu­nate expe­ri­ence of meet­ing indi­vid­u­als so crip­pled by a lack of trust in oth­ers that they nev­er form any authen­ti­cal­ly inti­mate con­nec­tions, whether in friend­ships or in roman­tic relationships. 

Never miss a thing with our FREE weekly newsletter.

I think Erikson may have been onto some­thing. But what if he didn’t take it far enough? What if the path our human selves must take, with its required stop­ping points and tasks along the way, unfolds on a much high­er level? 

What if our souls are con­tin­u­al­ly reborn, with the goal of mov­ing through these stages? Maybe those indi­vid­u­als who behave in seem­ing­ly child­ish ways (being self­ish, being emo­tion­al­ly imma­ture, being unable to form inti­mate rela­tion­ships) are sim­ply young souls. Perhaps their souls have not gone through this bizarre expe­ri­ence called exis­tence enough times to have reached “adult­hood.” Perhaps they need more oppor­tu­ni­ties to com­plete their tasks so they can advance to a high­er stage of development. 

Maybe those we encounter who seem to be “old souls,” even as chil­dren, have gone through this crazy thing we call life count­less times and com­plet­ed their required tasks along the way. They exist in their serene state of integri­ty because they have already rid­den the roller coast­er so many times that the thrills, the ascents, the plum­mets, and the sur­pris­es around every turn no longer fright­en them. They can gen­uine­ly just be along for the ride. 


Source: Palm, M. (n.d.). 19.1 Erikson’s the­o­ry of Psychosocial Development. Lifespan Human Development: A Topical Approach. 

Please share this story!