The framers of the United States Constitution got a lot wrong. The rights conÂtained in it were limÂitÂed to white male landownÂers. As our counÂtry has evolved, many issues have been corÂrectÂed by the process of amendÂments to the origÂiÂnal document.
One of the most imporÂtant amendÂments is the First Amendment, which enshrines the right of free speech and bars any laws from estabÂlishÂing a nationÂal reliÂgion or interÂferÂing with the freeÂdom to pracÂtice one’s own reliÂgion or none at all. Contrary to a wideÂly held belief that the US is a Christian nation, this demonÂstrates that the US Constitution is a secÂuÂlar docÂuÂment. There is no menÂtion of a god or deity in it.
The legÂisÂlaÂture of Louisiana has passed a law manÂdatÂing that the Ten Commandments be postÂed in every pubÂlic classÂroom in the state, includÂing those of pubÂlic uniÂverÂsiÂties. Of course, this was enactÂed with the intent of assessÂing the wall of sepÂaÂraÂtion between church and state. Kentucky adoptÂed a simÂiÂlar meaÂsure in 1978. This law was struck down by the United States Supreme Court in 1980 withÂout the jusÂtices hearÂing oral arguments.
The US Constitution, withÂin the First Amendment, states, “Congress shall make no law respectÂing an estabÂlishÂment of reliÂgion, or proÂhibitÂing the free exerÂcise thereÂof…” This stateÂment is comÂmonÂly referred to as the Establishment Clause, and it was the basis of the Court’s 1980 rulÂing, findÂing the Kentucky law unconstitutional.
Not to be outÂdone by Louisiana, the Oklahoma state superÂinÂtenÂdent of eduÂcaÂtion has manÂdatÂed that the Bible be in every classÂroom and that teachÂers must teach from it. I find this amazÂing in a time when fewÂer than fifty perÂcent of Americans describe themÂselves as reliÂgious, and only three in ten adults attend reliÂgious serÂvices regÂuÂlarÂly. These three in ten adults comÂprise the numÂber of peoÂple who attend any reliÂgious serÂvice, not just Christian services.
The dichotoÂmy between the prefÂerÂences of the genÂerÂal pubÂlic and this creepÂing Christian Nationalism is unnerving.
We can all cite examÂples in hisÂtoÂry where peoÂple used Christianity to excuse horÂriÂble behavÂior. Slavery, Jim Crow laws, the perÂseÂcuÂtion of LGBTQ indiÂvidÂuÂals, the subÂjuÂgaÂtion of women, wars, and the misÂtreatÂment of immiÂgrants have all been excused using false interÂpreÂtaÂtions of Christianity.
It is imporÂtant to note that not all Christians are Christian Nationalists. And Jesus did not direct his folÂlowÂers to make laws to judge the legal and moral behavÂior of their neighbors.
Christian Nationalism, or the belief that civÂil and crimÂiÂnal laws should reflect the beliefs of a parÂticÂuÂlar subÂgroup of Christians and that the United States is a favored nation, is not found anyÂwhere in Christianity. This is an inventÂed conÂstruct designed to force a parÂticÂuÂlar group’s views on the lives of all Americans.
Never miss a thing with our FREE weekly newsletter.
I have nevÂer underÂstood the obsesÂsion with postÂing the Ten Commandments, which are conÂtained in the Old Testament. These comÂmandÂments were givÂen to Moses and are a moral code for behavÂior under Jewish law, which actuÂalÂly has a total of 613 comÂmandÂments! No one is askÂing for schools to post 613 comÂmandÂments conÂtained in Judaism, the five pilÂlars of Islam, the Hindu Dharma, the five preÂcepts of Buddhism, the two laws givÂen by Jesus Christ (love God, love your neighÂbor), or the Ten Commitments of Humanism.
If lovÂing your neighÂbor is the goal of most peoÂple proÂfessÂing Christianity, I do not see how failÂing to respect my neighÂbor is comÂpatÂiÂble with this goal. The framers of our Constitution believed in freeÂdom of reliÂgion as well as freeÂdom from religion.
The insisÂtence that one’s own beliefs are the only truth is the mark of a closed mind and shows blaÂtant disÂreÂgard for all those who think or believe difÂferÂentÂly. Students and teachÂers from all backÂgrounds and beliefs should be acceptÂed and welÂcome in pubÂlic classÂrooms. No child should be made to feel difÂferÂent or “less than” othÂers because of the beliefs—or lack thereof—of their families.
While there are peoÂple in Kentucky who seek to divert tax dolÂlars from pubÂlic eduÂcaÂtion to priÂvate schools (some reliÂgious), it appears peoÂple in Louisiana and Oklahoma believe it is legitÂiÂmate to instiÂtute laws that are clearÂly illeÂgal. But in these strange times, Christian Nationalists undoubtÂedÂly feel emboldÂened by this US Supreme Court. This Court has issued some outÂraÂgeous rulÂings. We have seen a few of these in the past few weeks regardÂing the crimÂiÂnalÂizaÂtion of homeÂlessÂness and the lack of crimÂiÂnalÂizaÂtion of a presÂiÂdent encourÂagÂing an insurÂrecÂtion. In light of the fact that recentÂly appointÂed jusÂtices were choÂsen due to their reliÂgious views and perÂsonÂal beliefs, it bogÂgles the mind that it is perÂfectÂly legal to arrest and fine our neighÂbors who have no home and comÂmit the “crime” of sleepÂing in public.
So much for respectÂing the digÂniÂty of every human being and doing jusÂtice, huh?

