What the world needs now is more empathy

|

Estimated time to read:

6–9 minutes

A com­mon theme I see of late is that we need more [fill in the blank] to com­bat the hor­ri­ble nature and behav­ior of peo­ple. We need more laws. We need more pun­ish­ments. We need more prayer. We need more church.

While I would agree that there is some­thing we need more of to com­bat the cru­el­ty and self­ish­ness of human behav­ior, I can­not agree with most peo­ple on what that “some­thing” is. Because the answer isn’t big­ger gov­ern­ment. It isn’t stricter law enforce­ment. It isn’t harsh­er pun­ish­ments. It isn’t more reli­gion. (I would even con­tend that his­tor­i­cal­ly, each of these has done more to make the world a worse place to live, not a bet­ter one.) 

The answer is sim­ple: empa­thy.

When our chil­dren were lit­tle, my hus­band and I raised them with no reli­gious beliefs and with a healthy lev­el of skep­ti­cism when it comes to gov­ern­ment involve­ment in the lives of cit­i­zens. We did raise them, how­ev­er, with a strong empha­sis on how our own choic­es impact oth­ers in both pos­i­tive and neg­a­tive ways. We raised them to under­stand that every deci­sion we make sends rip­ples of impact out into the world around us. We should strive to make those rip­ples pos­i­tive ones.

“It makes us feel bet­ter when we bright­en some­one else’s day. It warms our hearts to help oth­ers. It gives us peace and con­tent­ment to con­tribute to the world around us. But this only works when we have empathy.”

I won’t speak for my hus­band, but as for me, I did not want to raise small humans who fol­low traf­fic reg­u­la­tions because they fear get­ting a tick­et. I want­ed them to learn to fol­low traf­fic reg­u­la­tions because doing so keeps all of us safer and everyone—even a total stranger—deserves to arrive safe­ly at their destination. 

Our poor choic­es should not endan­ger anoth­er per­son on their way to wher­ev­er they are head­ed in this world. I want­ed my chil­dren to respect things like rules and expec­ta­tions at school and in pub­lic places, not because they fear being dis­ci­plined. I want­ed them to do so because it helps every­one there have a bet­ter expe­ri­ence. Our poor choic­es should not cause anoth­er per­son to have a mis­er­able day at school, the gym, the library, etc. 

Finally, and per­haps most impor­tant­ly, I did not want to raise indi­vid­u­als who are kind, tol­er­ant, respect­ful, etc. because they fear some type of eter­nal agony and tor­ture for not doing so. I did not want to raise chil­dren who behave well because they antic­i­pate some type of eter­nal treat-filled par­adise if they are “good.” I want­ed them to see that treat­ing oth­ers with kind­ness, com­pas­sion, tol­er­ance, and respect makes the world a bet­ter place for every sin­gle one of us now, while we are liv­ing in it.

To make all of that a lit­tle sim­pler, I want­ed them to be “good” because it feels good to do so, not because they were fear­ing a pun­ish­ment or antic­i­pat­ing a reward. It makes us feel bet­ter when we bright­en some­one else’s day. It warms our hearts to help oth­ers. It gives us peace and con­tent­ment to con­tribute to the world around us. But this only works when we have empa­thy. When we are able to put our­selves in the prover­bial shoes of anoth­er, it is almost impos­si­ble to behave with cru­el­ty, with intol­er­ance, with indif­fer­ence. When we see the world through the lens of some­one else’s expe­ri­ence and world view, it becomes painful to behave in ways that cause hurt and harm.

Take the lady on your street who pulled right out in front of you. In the heat of that moment, you are prob­a­bly think­ing very unkind things and call­ing her all sorts of col­or­ful names. You may even decide that she deserves your loud horn blow and a point­ed ges­ture or two. You may feel bet­ter after doing these things because you took revenge after a per­ceived slight. 

But what if that lady pulled out in front of you because she was rush­ing to get to the hos­pi­tal where a loved one lay dying? What if she was dis­tract­ed because she had bills to pay and no mon­ey to pay them? What if she works the night shift but has to get to a par­ent-teacher con­fer­ence and hasn’t slept since yes­ter­day after­noon and isn’t on top of her dri­ving game right now? If you knew this lady and knew her sit­u­a­tion, would it be as easy to tear her apart? Would it feel good to treat her with cru­el­ty and unkind­ness? Or is it pos­si­ble that, with a tiny bit of empa­thy, you would find your­self let­ting it go with a shrug and maybe a groan (or if you are real­ly a saint, a deep desire to find this lady and help her with her strug­gles) and just go on with your day?

I gen­uine­ly feel that this applies to the larg­er ills of the world, too.

Illegal immi­gra­tion? Maybe take a moment and think about the hor­ri­ble con­di­tions from which many of these indi­vid­u­als are flee­ing. Spend a few sec­onds think­ing about what you would (or wouldn’t) do to pro­tect your chil­dren from harm. To make a bet­ter life for them. To give them a chance to make their dreams come true.

Gang vio­lence? Maybe pon­der the very real need for youth in cer­tain neigh­bor­hoods to have a group of allies in order to not be killed or have their fam­i­lies face vio­lence. If your choic­es were to join in on law­less behav­ior or have your­self and your fam­i­ly become the tar­gets of vio­lence, what would you do? Would you take the moral high ground even if it meant you lost every­one you love?

Bigotry and racism? This one is super easy. All it takes is rid­ding your­self of the idea that peo­ple who are not like you are your ene­mies and some­how less than human. A tiny minute to see that they are all fac­ing the same strug­gles as you and all want the same things. In oth­er words, just a lit­tle empathy.

Volunteer giving drink to homeless man outdoors
Volunteer giv­ing drink to home­less man out­doors. (Adobe Stock)

Homelessness? As an avid camper and back­pack­er, I can­not actu­al­ly say that I believe no one would choose to live out­side or in a tent all the time. But I do believe that it is high­ly unlike­ly that some­one would choose to be unhoused if giv­en the oppor­tu­ni­ty not to be. So, maybe take a minute to pon­der that the medi­an income for a per­son liv­ing in Kentucky is around $31,000 per year, while the medi­an cost of a house is around $280,000. Consider the fact that to take out a mort­gage for such a house, that per­son mak­ing $2,500 per month could have a mort­gage pay­ment of $1,700 (or a rent of $1,300 a month for a one-bed­room apart­ment). Ponder if you could make this work? What if you were also rais­ing chil­dren? What if you had expen­sive med­ical conditions?

Empathy has so much pow­er. It takes us out of a place of blame, of judge­ment, of vin­dic­tive­ness and brings us to a place of com­pas­sion, of self­less­ness, of altru­ism. With a lit­tle empa­thy, we see the peo­ple around us (both near and very very far) for all that they are. We see their strug­gles and stres­sors. We see the bar­ri­ers that may be keep­ing them from being their own best selves. We see that we might be mak­ing the very same choic­es if we were trav­el­ing this life in their shoes. 

Never miss a thing with our FREE weekly newsletter.

One small drop of this amaz­ing stuff and sud­den­ly we real­ize that we can actu­al­ly make things a lit­tle bet­ter for oth­ers. We see that doing so is exact­ly what makes all of it worthwhile. 

Religion can’t do that unless the focus of orga­nized reli­gion shifts towards spread­ing kind­ness and help­ful­ness instead of divi­sive­ness and intol­er­ance. Religions often encour­age com­pas­sion and tol­er­ance, but only with­in their own con­gre­ga­tions or larg­er institutions. 

The gov­ern­ment can’t do it either. All it can do is crim­i­nal­ize fac­ing strug­gles. Add to that the fact that gov­ern­ments rely on the notion of “us vs. them” as a means to iden­ti­fy who the ene­mies are and win elec­tions. Punishments won’t work. They will deter bad choic­es only as long as the alter­na­tives aren’t just as ter­ri­ble. People are often will­ing to face pun­ish­ment or the risk of it in order to do what they need to do.

What the world needs now (sor­ry to con­tra­dict you, Jackie DeShannon) … is more empathy!

Please share this story!