The recent rise in the use of AI, or artificial intelligence, has been at the forefront of the news lately. AI seems to be everywhere, making everything from videos to art to the written word. It may be easier to use a machine to do things, but is it better?
I think the first time I heard about a computer that could do what to me is unbelievable was a news story featuring videos that looked and sounded exactly like Tom Cruise but were created by computer programs called deep fakes. The video was featured in a news story on 60 Minutes by Bill Whitaker. During the spot, the process was demonstrated by creating a video that looked and sounded exactly like Bill Whitaker — but was nothing he had ever actually said or done.
Several weeks ago, CBS Sunday Morning featured computer-generated art — a picture created simply by speaking a general description and painting style into one of several computer programs. No human artist’s paintbrush ever touched an actual canvas. I find it difficult to find value in a painting that lacks the emotion and expression any artist adds to their art.
More recently on Sunday Morning, a web service called ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) was discussed that can write anything from a letter to a college-level essay, from a poem to a computer program. I may have been tempted to try it in my college days to complete those last-minute assignments if it had been around.
None of the AI-created creations was anything I would consider real art. Real art, to me, requires time, focused thoughtfulness, and, most of all, imagination and creativity. Imagination is something that is strictly a human trait, and one that is becoming increasingly rare as more is done with computers.
On the other hand, the potential for artificial intelligence to enhance our lives is real. AI could be used for tutoring, to make learning anything from algebra to another language faster and more effective. It could be used to help students learn how to spell and use words in a way that enhances literature rather than simply spelling and grammar.
Even the ever-increasing use of voicemail rather than an actual person for customer service could be much less frustrating through AI.
I’ve long been a fan of computers and what they can do, but, as in most everything, there are both positives and negatives to using them. Ethical questions are raised as to the uses of AI. The end result of relying too much on AI, I fear, would be the loss to us of creativity and true artistic talent. The loss of imagination could not only depress our art, but it could affect our ability to create things like new inventions that would make our lives better. Still, it depends on how this new technology is used before we’ll know if our lives are improved by it.
Editor’s note: In the interest of full disclosure, I feel compelled to note that we have experimented with AI-generated images a couple of times here. While I certainly agree with Lynn about the lack of imagination and true creativity in this type of “art,” there are some use cases for it. For example, when searching through stock image databases for a very specific scene we wish to portray for a story, it’s sometimes tough to find just the right image. But when you use AI to generate “an impressionist style painting of a vault near a big oak tree amid the ruins of a burned-out house,” you may just get lucky with AI.

