Data center debate absent from court agenda

Special meeting rules leave residents without a chance for public comment

|

Estimated time to read:

2–3 minutes

Discussion of data cen­ters is not on the Clark County Fiscal Court’s agen­da for its meet­ing this Thursday. It nev­er was.

As report­ed pre­vi­ous­ly by WinCity Voices, the Oct. 22 reg­u­lar meet­ing was resched­uled and will be held on 5:30 p.m. Oct. 29 in the cir­cuit court­room on the sec­ond floor of the Clark County Courthouse.

Officials say the rea­son has noth­ing to do with data cen­ters. It was changed because the Fiscal Court’s meet­ing room down­stairs is need­ed for ear­ly vot­ing, which begins this Thursday and con­tin­ues through Saturday.

County Judge-Executive R.J. Palmer said Monday after­noon that dis­cus­sion of data cen­ters isn’t on the agen­da, and spe­cial meet­ings don’t include pub­lic com­ments or mag­is­trates’ com­ments about items not on the agenda.

“We just need­ed to have a meet­ing to pay the bills,” he explained.

Adam Johnson, an orga­niz­er of the No Kings protests, said he and Robin Kunkel start­ed a Facebook events page, Demand a Data Center Moratorium in Clark County. Jessica Estes Charles is also list­ed as one of the creators.

The Facebook page men­tions that the city of Winchester has enact­ed a mora­to­ri­um on data cen­ters, and sug­gests that peo­ple come to the Oct. 29 meet­ing to ask the Fiscal Court to enact one for the part of the coun­ty out­side city limits.

Johnson said Monday he had not talked with Palmer about the meet­ing, but oth­ers have. The day after the Facebook page was cre­at­ed, he learned that the meet­ing had been changed, and he and oth­ers assumed it was “because they need­ed the big­ger court­room” to accom­mo­date a crowd.

“Then what I heard short­ly after that was [that] they were not going to allow pub­lic com­ments,” Johnson said.

Magistrate Robert Blanton thought that Chelsea Kirk, a Democratic can­di­date for state rep­re­sen­ta­tive, was behind the effort to get the issue on the agen­da. Kirk said she sup­ports the effort but did not ini­ti­ate it.

She was “ampli­fy­ing” it, she said, because so many vot­ers she’s talked with sup­port it.

Palmer said that Magistrate Stephen Craycraft had sent him a pro­posed res­o­lu­tion about data cen­ters, and he for­ward­ed it to County Attorney William Elkins to consider.

Elkins told him he want­ed more time to study it.

Never miss a thing with our FREE weekly newsletter.

Also, the judge said, Elkins won’t be at the Oct. 29 meet­ing, and he didn’t want to take up the issue with­out the coun­ty attor­ney being there.

Unless it is placed on the agen­da, or there’s a spe­cial meet­ing on it, it’s unlike­ly to be dis­cussed in November because the meet­ings are all spe­cial called meet­ings. The Nov. 11 meet­ing will be resched­uled to Nov. 10 at 8:30 a.m. because of Veterans Day, and the Nov. 26 meet­ing will be resched­uled to Nov. 24 at 5:30 p.m. due to Thanksgiving.

“That’s almost two months with­out any pub­lic com­ment,” Craycraft said.

The res­o­lu­tion for a two-year mora­to­ri­um could be on the agen­da for con­sid­er­a­tion at the Nov. 10 meet­ing. “I expect it will be,” Craycraft said.

Please share this story!