County judge candidates differ on leadership

Republican candidates sparred over experience, transparency, budgeting, and public trust ahead of primary

|

Estimated time to read:

5–8 minutes

What does it take to be an effec­tive coun­ty judge-executive?

That was the main point of con­tention in a Republican can­di­dates’ debate on May 13 at The Venue at Whiskey & Wiles.

Three of the four Republicans vying to be the county’s chief exec­u­tive offi­cer made their case to the vot­ers dur­ing the town hall-style forum: County Magistrate Steve Craycraft, City Commissioner Shannon Cox, and busi­ness­man Justin Charles.

The fourth, Eric Vetter, a phar­ma­cist and retired naval offi­cer, did not attend.

Craycraft, who has been the 3rd District mag­is­trate for three years and briefly served as inter­im coun­ty judge, pre­sent­ed him­self as the only one with the right background.

“I believe that unless you have coun­ty gov­ern­ment expe­ri­ence, you are not qual­i­fied to do this job,” he said.

Without men­tion­ing Charles by name, Craycraft said there was one can­di­date who had “no pub­lic ser­vice expe­ri­ence whatsoever.”

Later in the exchange, when the can­di­dates were asked about their lead­er­ship style, Craycraft spoke direct­ly to Charles, ask­ing when he had ever led anyone.

Craycraft said there has been mis­in­for­ma­tion cir­cu­lat­ed about the coun­ty government’s sup­pos­ed­ly dire finan­cial circumstances.

“That’s not true. We are good. Despite a lot of obsta­cles that we have had dur­ing this past admin­is­tra­tion, we have done very well,” he said. “The prob­lem is poor man­age­ment, and we need more account­abil­i­ty. And I am the one who has been on the inside, and I know what needs to be done, and I will do that.”

Cox, who smiled through­out Craycraft’s open­ing state­ment, said he had been a city com­mis­sion­er for 28 years and was famil­iar with bud­get­ing and finan­cial plan­ning. He also not­ed that it was only a short walk across the street from City Hall to the Clark County Courthouse.

“I think I can make that tran­si­tion pret­ty easy,” he said.

Cox said he knows that “when you get to the end of the mon­ey … you have to stop spending.”

The first thing he would do as judge-exec­u­tive would be to bud­get a con­tin­gency fund for the Fiscal Court.

“We have to be pre­pared for the unex­pect­ed,” he said.

A large crowd attended the town hall-style debate at Whiskey & Wiles.
A large crowd attend­ed the town hall-style debate at Whiskey & Wiles. (J.P. Martin)

“I’m run­ning for Clark County judge-exec­u­tive because I believe the coun­ty gov­ern­ment should work for the peo­ple again,” Charles stated.

For too long, he said, the Fiscal Court has fall­en short of its most impor­tant respon­si­bil­i­ty, which is “rep­re­sent­ing the peo­ple of the coun­ty and pro­tect­ing their best interests.”

His goals, he said, were to restore trust, trans­paren­cy, and account­abil­i­ty. That starts with being “open and hon­est about all of our finan­cial deci­sions” and ensur­ing tax­pay­ers under­stand how their mon­ey is spent. And it means bet­ter com­mu­ni­ca­tion with the pub­lic, he added.

As coun­ty judge, Charles said, he would hold quar­ter­ly dis­trict meet­ings around the coun­ty and lis­ten to cit­i­zens’ concerns.

“Throughout this elec­tion, we’ve heard a lot about expe­ri­ence, but expe­ri­ence only mat­ters if it pro­duces results,” he said.

During the ques­tions, the can­di­dates were asked, “What makes a can­di­date qualified?”

Craycraft repeat­ed what he had said ear­li­er about the impor­tance of expe­ri­ence in coun­ty government.

Cox agreed that it was impor­tant, but “not vital.” He said that when he became a com­mis­sion­er in 1999, he was “over­whelmed,” but he added, “You learn these things.”

The most impor­tant les­son, Cox said, is to be orga­nized, to plan, to listen.

Charles said the most impor­tant qual­i­ty is how an offi­cial treats peo­ple. Respect is what vot­ers want from a leader, he said.

The sec­ond ques­tion was: “What does lead­er­ship look like for you, espe­cial­ly when oth­ers are falling short?”

Cox respond­ed by quot­ing University of Kentucky base­ball coach Nick Mingione: “A lead­ers knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way.”

It’s impor­tant not only to know the direc­tion, but to lead from the front, he explained.

Charles said he has always been will­ing “to do the hard things” that he asked oth­ers to do.

In his one-minute rebut­tal to Craycraft’s ques­tion about when he had led, Charles, a mas­ter elec­tri­cian, said he had been involved in con­struc­tion projects that were team efforts. He admit­ted that he had no employ­ees, but said he leads him­self. Every morn­ing, “I get up and moti­vate myself,” he said.

Transparency, accountability, and taxpayers’ money

The can­di­dates were asked about trans­paren­cy and com­mu­ni­ca­tion, in par­tic­u­lar regard­ing the coun­ty budget.

Charles repeat­ed his plans for meet­ings with mag­is­trates and con­stituents, and said coun­ty offi­cials should lis­ten more than talk.

Craycraft said his door would always be open to any­one who wants to come by.

Cox said he would have open office hours where noth­ing else is on his sched­ule except meet­ing with mag­is­trates, depart­ment heads, and oth­ers. He would vary the times to accom­mo­date people’s schedules.

Asked how the coun­ty gov­ern­ment could meet infra­struc­ture needs with­out over­bur­den­ing tax­pay­ers, Cox said it was impor­tant to set priorities.

“We have a five-year plan for just about every­thing” in city gov­ern­ment, he said, to decide what to pay for now and what to defer buy­ing until later.

Also, Cox said, it’s nec­es­sary to under­stand that some large pur­chas­es will require bor­row­ing mon­ey through bond sales.

Charles said he would put togeth­er a plan to deter­mine infra­struc­ture pri­or­i­ties, and he men­tioned that a top pri­or­i­ty should be the east­ern bypass, also known as Veterans Memorial Parkway.

He said it will be “real­ly tough” to improve the county’s cur­rent finan­cial condition.

“It’s going to take some tight­en­ing up of all depart­ments” and “hard looks” at things in the bud­get “that need to be cut to the bone if we’re going to move for­ward,” he said.

Craycraft said “the holdup” on devel­op­ing the east­ern bypass is that the coun­ty doesn’t have the mon­ey for infra­struc­ture, and it needs the “full sup­port” of the state leg­is­la­ture. He said the county’s Republican leg­is­la­tors, Sen. Greg Elkins and Rep. Ryan Dotson, have been work­ing hard to get that funding.

As for being finan­cial­ly strapped, Craycraft said: “We’re OK on mon­ey, we just need to move things around from time to time.”

The final ques­tion con­cerned the county’s com­post site for dis­pos­ing of dead animals.

“It is a mod­el for ani­mal decom­po­si­tion in Kentucky,” said Craycraft, in whose dis­trict the site is located.

Unfortunately, he not­ed, the for­mer coun­ty judge-exec­u­tive had missed out on some mon­ey that could have been used for improv­ing that pro­gram, and when he fired the super­vi­sor, “it had to shut down for a while.”

Craycraft didn’t men­tion the name of that judge-exec­u­tive, Les Yates, who left office ear­ly this year to run for state representative.

During his time as inter­im coun­ty judge after Yates’ unex­pect­ed res­ig­na­tion, Craycraft said, he got a call from Kentucky’s General Counsel for the Dept of Agriculture, and they were able to rein­state the mon­ey for the expansion.

“I was there in the month of August, and I gagged,” Cox said, describ­ing a vis­it to the com­post site.

Never miss a thing with our FREE weekly newsletter.

Cox said the coun­ty needs to con­tact the Department of Agriculture and the Division of Water for help con­trol­ling runoff from the site.

Charles said he was not famil­iar with the guide­lines or the fund­ing required, so he would have to “dig deep­er” into the issue, but it is impor­tant to the county’s farm­ers and war­rants the county’s atten­tion and investment.

The win­ner of the May 19 Republican pri­ma­ry will face Democratic can­di­date Vaché King in the Nov. 3 gen­er­al elec­tion. King, who is unop­posed in her party’s pri­ma­ry this year, also ran in 2022 but lost the nom­i­na­tion to Charles, who ran as a Democrat that year and recent­ly changed his reg­is­tra­tion to Republican.


This sto­ry was updat­ed on 5/15/2026 5:12 p.m. to clar­i­fy that Mr. Craycraft spoke to the General Counsel for the Department of Agriculture, and not the Secretary of Agriculture, as pre­vi­ous­ly reported. 

Please share this story!